As the White House keeps roiling the topmost organization in the American espionage hierarchy, questions have resurfaced that date back to the creation of the nearly quarter-century-old Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Do we need it all or could we get rid of it? Should it be large or small? Should it be superior or auxiliary to the 18 other spy agencies of the United States? And how exactly can we assure that any Director of National Intelligence doesn¡¯t deploy the office¡¯s prodigious snooping powers to play politics instead of saving American lives by foreseeing the next national-security disaster?
The ongoing turmoil at ODNI is the inevitable consequence of Donald Trump¡¯s approach to the intelligence community. Especially in his second term, the president has chosen people to serve as DNI who are blatantly unqualified in terms of national-security expertise but who seem willing if not eager to wield their power to indulge Trump¡¯s personal grievances and obsessions.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.