At the height of the Profumo ministerial sex scandal in 1963, the death knell was sounded on one of Britain¡¯s most successful postwar prime ministers, Harold Macmillan, by a fellow Tory quoting a line from Robert Browning¡¯s poem ¡°The Lost Leader¡°: ¡°Never glad confident morning again.¡± Nigel Birch¡¯s intervention signaled the ¡°glimmer of twilight¡± for his boss. Within three months he had departed No 10. And Macmillan was a political giant compared to the current incumbent, Keir Starmer.
It will never be glad confident morning again for Labour¡¯s prime minister, and it rarely has been since he took office in July 2024. Macmillan looked like a man out of his time after six years in office and a decades long political career. Starmer has been in No. 10 for only 18 months and has already exhausted the credit of a landslide election victory. By admitting to the House of Commons this week that he was warned of Peter Mandelson¡¯s continuing friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein before appointing him U.S. ambassador, Starmer has placed himself on political Death Row.
Taking on Birch¡¯s role, former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner led a rebellion of Labour legislators to force Starmer to allow a cross-party Parliamentary committee to decide which official documents about Mandelson¡¯s vetting and appointment should be made public. The PM and his few remaining loyalists have tried to deflect blame by ramping up the outrage over his appointee¡¯s treachery and lies about the depth of his Epstein relationship. But they can¡¯t escape the facts. Starmer failed to do due diligence and wagered it was worth bringing back a scandal-prone operator known to love the company of amoral rich people. Two other Labour prime ministers, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, had made that same miscalculation before.
It¡¯s in the nature of politicians to gamble. The Conservative Party knew Boris Johnson was careless about the truth and conducted multiple affairs, but it still chose him as leader. For a while it paid off: Johnson won big in an election and got Brexit done after years of stalemate, before he was swept away by a tide of scandal. Brown, too, had the excuse that his back was against the wall, threatened by internal rebellion and a resurgent Tory opposition at the back end of the New Labour era. Indeed, for a while Mandelson steadied the ship. In Starmer¡¯s case, the risk wasn¡¯t worth taking ¡ª he already had a successful U.S. ambassador in Karen Pierce.
I won¡¯t join the queue of repentant Westminster hacks voicing regret about being entranced by the so-called Prince of Darkness. Mandelson¡¯s nature was always apparent to me, as it was to his Labour colleagues...
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.